I behaved in ways that I find childish and embarrassing. I did things that I feel are appalling. Did I do them because that is who I truly am?
Same.
I once heard a recovering alcoholic talk about the embarrassing way he used to behave when drunk, how he had humiliated himself, offended people, lost jobs, broken laws. Were those behaviors--the things he did--who he truly was, were they things he enjoyed doing? Of course not or he'd still be doing them sober. He has no fond memories, only shame (his words). The horrible, out-of-character behaviors were the price of doing business to get what he really needed out of drinking: the escape from difficult feelings.
AN's WW needs to, if she wants to get healthy, figure out why she did this, what she was really getting out of it.
On other threads, under different circumstances, everyone here seems to know that the A is "not about you." But for some reason, if the subject is what type of sex the WW is 'willing to give' during R, then that common knowledge gets completely torpedoed. I think this is what triggers so many women, the idea that if a couple tries to R, the WW no longer has sexual agency. As women, our bodies and sexual desires always remain our own. There is nothing in this world that compromises that fundamental truth--not if we wear a short skirt, show too much cleavage, slow dance with a guy, go home with a guy, or cheat. No matter what we do, who we do it with, or why we did it, it's always our body that is not owed to anyone. And nothing we choose to do with it is ever owed to anyone else. Discussions to the contrary are triggering for most of us because we spend a lifetime defending this concept.
That said, every human being has the right to decide that which is hurtful and intolerable, whether you are a BS or not. Nobody needs to justify being hurt enough to draw a boundary. That is the essence of drawing boundaries--you get to decide what is acceptable. If AspectNorth decides that his WW's sexual "choices" are too hurtful and he wants to leave, then that's what he absolutely should do. That is his human right--to get away from people who cause him pain. That is how we keep ourselves happy.
I happen to believe that his WW's behaviors have been pretty hurtful, and I'm not sure that I could recover. But I also know that marriage is a complex thing, and telling someone to D is ignoring all of the other feelings and implications of marriage in that person's life. I'm not prepared to EVER tell someone to D. That is so, so not my place. But I'll happily tell someone that they may have to D so that they can achieve their goals, one of which may be living in a more respectful setting. AN may need to D if he continues to feel hurt and disrespected, but how can anyone here simply announce that she is "not going to change" and proceed to tell him what to do? Who the hell do you think you are when you suppose to KNOW what other people should do? You don't even know any of these people irl. It's so presumptuous and bullying. And factually wrong!
Drawing a boundary is not an ultimatum. Yes, if you are very scared or CoD or immature, you can confuse the two and try to force the behaviors you need to see. Or settle for less. That's where IC for the BS comes in. If you are not happy and still stay, that's a YOU problem that you need to figure out. IC teaches you what properly respecting your needs looks like.
Many of us feel we need to justify to our spouse or family or the world WHY we want a D. And we know that the narrative will play out that it was us who "wanted the D! They are the one who left ME!" We imagine even our kids will believe this false narrative, even though we have bent over backwards trying to make the M or reconciliation work while our misbehaving spouse did not walk the walk. But, that is pretty much the story of D even when there is no cheating. The person who files gets blamed while the other spouse is acting out; you cannot correct that narrative overnight. And lots of people involved in the D will have opinions, judgements, feel wronged, blah, blah, blah. It's awful for the many involved. But divorce is actually just a boundary that gets enforced in a dysfunctional M, not a threat or bargaining chip to say "I want enthusiastic oral or you are out!" That is not how boundaries work, they aren't threats to do what I say. THAT is bullying. I mean, come on! AN's WW is well aware of what he needs. There is no use announcing and bullying. But if an allotted time goes by (did he say that he was giving it six months?) and he is feeling unloved and seeing little work, then it will be on him to enforce this boundary in his own life. He will need to say, "I cannot stay in an R that is so hurtful. I don't feel loved. I must go." And if he can't do that, it's up to him why. It's not up to the BTW Club to scream in his face that he needs to "man up" or whatever. But that is what we mean about having boundaries around what you need, not a list of demands. If people do not understand the difference between boundaries and demands, then that is important work for those people to do in IC. It means your relationships are likely suffering in ways you don't even realize as you bully and threaten (and hook up with people who have no boundaries, potentially opening yourself up to more infidelity in the future) or as you move your boundaries and minimize your needs (and hook up with narcissists, bullies, or selfish types who may step all over you). Understanding boundaries is critical for healthy relationships.
Good luck with whatever you do, AN. I hope you can find the peace you deserve.
[This message edited by OwningItNow at 3:53 PM, Sunday, March 26th]