Truth, I'll group your last two posts together and do my best to respond.
With the intentionality piece, his wife is set up for failure by default. If she’s enthusiastic with sex, (which according to Dr is approximately 10 out of 11 times), she’s just manipulating him. If she’s not enthusiastic, then she doesn’t care about him.
That's not true. I do not think the 10 good sessions are manipulation. Others have suggested that and I've disagreed with them.
I totally get where he’s wanting it to be, that it’s not just the sex that’s the issue, but she can’t get there if all roads lead to failure. When you add in her component of people pleasing, she’s totally fucked. DrS has even indicated this when he basically says she can’t get out of her own way. HO has also described this (as I understand her). It’s not that it’s acceptable; it’s that the deck is currently stacked against her (Dr’s wife) - and I think she very much feels that. It’s one reason I’ve suggested taking sex off the table. It seems to be the most significant stumbling block right now - for BOTH of them.
I agree sex has been a catalyst for conflict; I don't think sex is the primary issue. Her incident with me giving her oral sex a few weeks ago, the BJ earlier this week, and the conversation while fully clothed today, all share the same issue.
My wife is entirely focused inward--she cares about how she feels and what she thinks. If she's angry--which is virtually always because she failed to establish a boundary on something--all she cares about is that anger. She cannot empathize with me. When I was giving her oral sex, she was pissed about her parents not being able to stay and lashed out at me. When she was giving me a BJ, she was angry about not being able to go workout. When she was answering the affair questions this afternoon, she was angry at me for asking questions similar to ones I asked months ago and it making her feel bad about herself. In all three instances, she was focused on how she felt and never considered how I felt.
Granted, the bedroom instances are more explosive because *I* find them more hurtful due to our history in the bedroom--it's an open wound for me. But the mechanism in her brain is the same all the time.
There seems to be a pattern where Dr posts things are going well and he receives a whole chorus of caution, assumptions (she’s just manipulating you), and pushing for what he’s going to do if something doesn’t go well. He draws lines in the sand because it triggers his need to self-protect. Then something doesn’t go well, he shares, and then there’s the whole chorus of action he needs to take - lest he teaches his wife that he will tolerate this kind of behavior and by that, then he also somehow is complicit in it. He’s heavily reminded of his prior "boundary" so he makes an emotional decision that he’s not emotionally resolved to support (because it was never an authentic boundary). Some time passes, initial emotion calms, and he’s re-evaluating. But when he corrects his path - based on his own internal resolve - then he gets the "I knew you wouldn’t follow through" responses so he must then reestablish the next "boundary" to self-protect. Speaking personally, this feels like shaming to me - and I’m just not ok with that. I’ve experienced this cycle - though I don’t think any of it was malicious. It just wasn’t helpful.
Dr S is a big boy here and I think he has more than demonstrated his ability to take it as well as his appreciation for it. That’s not my judgement to make or my battle to fight. But I’ve been here long enough to know that conversations that focus on gender never go well and are very rarely productive or resolvable. They’re just too emotionally charged and they often diverge into fruitless rabbit trails that end up getting the whole thread locked. That’s the logical reason for my response above. My personal reasons are different but not worth fueling the fires that will come.
I think that's fair as a general assessment, but you're not giving me enough credit here. If you think I almost kicked my WW out of the house because I was being bullied to do so by a few anonymous people on the internet, you're very much mistaken.
Is this all you got out of that whole response? If so, I would subsequently ask, which of my emphasized words stands out more to you? Because in a large sense I think this is where your threads seem to turn into the mulberry bush.
You're asking what stands out more in "scared victim"--"victim" stands out more as that's the subject--"scared" is just the adjective. And we agree she's scared--I think she often is operating out of fear. I don't think she's a victim though, but I do think the post framed her as such by emphasizing and exaggerating my perceived negative qualities. Even if that was a wholly accurate description of me, my wife still wouldn't be a victim. I don't need to better understand how my WW sees herself as a victim--I've been married to her for a decade. She's always a victim, so of course that's how she feels about herself.
(I apologize in advance if I missed your point on this specific exercise.)
To a large degree I get the impression that your wife’s authenticity is what you most want.
What I most want is to see her remorseful for the pain she caused me. After that, I think what I most want is for her to feel comfortable with open and transparent communication (which is certainly tied to her authenticity).
It’s why the sex itself doesn’t seem to be the issue; it’s how she feels about the sex. But you also want her authenticity to align with what YOU want to experience/feel. I get that…and I think that’s critical to the long term compatibility of the marriage. But there was absolutely zero regard to the fact that your wife was indeed authentic with you about how she felt about the BJ simply because her timing sucked. I get that too…how one demonstrates/shares authenticity is also important. I’m not minimizing the impact that had on you or the fact that she could have been authentic sooner and with more kindness. This is her process.
Her lashing out with anger there is who she has always been--it's not a step in a journey to be more authentic.
I am not a scared victim. I’m also quite sure of what I think and how I feel. I’ve got zero reasons to people please with you - nothing hangs in the balance. . Additionally, I am often regarded as an excellent debater - and while it may seem arrogant to admit, I do see myself that way. All that to say, I feel "defeated" in many of our exchanges. Not because I feel "bested"…but because I feel it futile - like the points I make never really get digested, just dismissed. That’s not on you…I’m just not invested enough to continue. All that to say, I can only imagine how your wife might be experiencing this - and especially based on how you’ve described her.
I'm sorry you feel that way. I enjoy reading your posts.
If you want to stay involved with the hopes that your wife will be able to implement change, you’re gonna have to decide what change is most critical and needs to come first. If it’s her authenticity then you’re gonna have to prioritize that over how you feel when she IS authentic. Part of the way to do that is to gain perspective on how your wife may be experiencing everything. The way to withstand how that affects you emotionally is to focus on that aspect (how it makes you feel) as being YOUR work.
As noted though, that's not my priority. She has some significant issues that need to be resolved--and Steven nailed it in his post: I need her to stop only looking inward. Your framing of this seems genuinely strange to me. She shows me little remorse and does hurtful things, and you respond by writing that at least she was being authentic. She has always been authentic in her hurtful moments, so it's tough to see progress in that.
Otherwise, it seems our responses are just going to continue to focus on and argue whether you just leave or stay.
I don't recall one time--in 100+ pages--asking for advice on whether I should leave or stay. That question is not my focus, regardless of how many times other people may answer it.